THESHADOWBOX.NET

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Amanda's got a blog. If blogs could talk, it'd ask you to read it. It might even say "please."

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [All]   Go Down

Author Topic: "Social" Darwinism vs. Communism vs. Socialism vs. Capitalism  (Read 13999 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

preferpencil

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 555
  • if sharks didn't have rows of teeth, then what?
"Social" Darwinism vs. Communism vs. Socialism vs. Capitalism
« on: September 25, 2008, 01:20:47 PM »

pick your favorite(s)?




odd. i didn't really mean to include Social Darwinism.
Logged
"But it's never too late for the poetry of regret."--lee upton

CeeGBee

  • Too o-o-old to rock & ro-o-oll, but too young to die...
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18563
    • Facebook, website, what's the dif?
Re: "Social" Darwinism vs. Communism vs. Socialism vs. Capitalism
« Reply #1 on: September 25, 2008, 04:32:12 PM »

These are all extreme points on the (metaphorical, of course) wheel of human systems.

None can truly exist in pure form, and (IMHO) the optimal arrangement of things would fall somewhere in
the area of that wheel, having elements of all of these.

I choose balance (as I do in most things).
Logged
Is it bad that what she said made perfect sense to me?

caddy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3463
  • The Anti-Semantic
Re: "Social" Darwinism vs. Communism vs. Socialism vs. Capitalism
« Reply #2 on: September 25, 2008, 04:42:03 PM »

somebody drank a few too many cups of coffee this morning.
Logged

CeeGBee

  • Too o-o-old to rock & ro-o-oll, but too young to die...
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18563
    • Facebook, website, what's the dif?
Re: "Social" Darwinism vs. Communism vs. Socialism vs. Capitalism
« Reply #3 on: September 25, 2008, 04:42:54 PM »

somebody drank a few too many cups of coffee this morning.
Who?
Logged
Is it bad that what she said made perfect sense to me?

caddy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3463
  • The Anti-Semantic
Re: "Social" Darwinism vs. Communism vs. Socialism vs. Capitalism
« Reply #4 on: September 25, 2008, 04:48:58 PM »

somebody drank a few too many cups of coffee this morning.
Who?

i see no owls in this vicinity.
Logged

CeeGBee

  • Too o-o-old to rock & ro-o-oll, but too young to die...
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18563
    • Facebook, website, what's the dif?
Re: "Social" Darwinism vs. Communism vs. Socialism vs. Capitalism
« Reply #5 on: September 25, 2008, 04:51:36 PM »

somebody drank a few too many cups of coffee this morning.
Who?
i see no owls in this vicinity.
Prithee, allow me to clarify:

You have suggested that someone has consumed an excess of coffee this morning.  I wish to know
the identity of the person so described. 
Logged
Is it bad that what she said made perfect sense to me?

caddy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3463
  • The Anti-Semantic
Re: "Social" Darwinism vs. Communism vs. Socialism vs. Capitalism
« Reply #6 on: September 25, 2008, 05:01:56 PM »

somebody drank a few too many cups of coffee this morning.
Who?
i see no owls in this vicinity.
Prithee, allow me to clarify:

You have suggested that someone has consumed an excess of coffee this morning.  I wish to know
the identity of the person so described. 

i'm going to pretend like you're not serious, and continue to laugh at this.
Logged

CeeGBee

  • Too o-o-old to rock & ro-o-oll, but too young to die...
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18563
    • Facebook, website, what's the dif?
Re: "Social" Darwinism vs. Communism vs. Socialism vs. Capitalism
« Reply #7 on: September 25, 2008, 05:33:45 PM »

somebody drank a few too many cups of coffee this morning.
Who?
i see no owls in this vicinity.
Prithee, allow me to clarify:

You have suggested that someone has consumed an excess of coffee this morning.  I wish to know
the identity of the person so described. 

i'm going to pretend like you're not serious, and continue to laugh at this.
I KNOW you're not talkin' about me...  'cuz the last time I drank any coffee at all was 1984...
Srsly...  I don't touch the stuff.

So anyway, the whole commie, socialist, captalist-dog, darwinist thing....  Eh?
Logged
Is it bad that what she said made perfect sense to me?

SomewhatDamaged

  • The greatest thing to have come out of East London since the plague
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 1709
  • The devils of truth steal the souls of the free
Re: "Social" Darwinism vs. Communism vs. Socialism vs. Capitalism
« Reply #8 on: September 25, 2008, 05:55:31 PM »

'cuz the last time I drank any coffee at all was 1984...


 :o

How the hell do you function?
My body runs on a strict diet of caffine & nicotine, without coffee (& lots of it) I would struggle to walk on my hind legs!
Logged
Im an alltogether different being, I got black wings of fire & eyes of true seeing

CeeGBee

  • Too o-o-old to rock & ro-o-oll, but too young to die...
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18563
    • Facebook, website, what's the dif?
Re: "Social" Darwinism vs. Communism vs. Socialism vs. Capitalism
« Reply #9 on: September 25, 2008, 06:13:18 PM »

'cuz the last time I drank any coffee at all was 1984...

 :o

How the hell do you function?
My body runs on a strict diet of caffine & nicotine, without coffee (& lots of it) I would struggle to walk on my hind legs!
No nic for me, thanx...
But lots of Twinings, PG Tips, Bewley's...
Kroger house-brand when I'm especially broke...
Carytown Tea Co. and Teavana loose when I have a bit of spare change....

...and diet cola, but it's got less caf.
Logged
Is it bad that what she said made perfect sense to me?

SomewhatDamaged

  • The greatest thing to have come out of East London since the plague
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 1709
  • The devils of truth steal the souls of the free
Re: "Social" Darwinism vs. Communism vs. Socialism vs. Capitalism
« Reply #10 on: September 25, 2008, 06:18:02 PM »

'cuz the last time I drank any coffee at all was 1984...

 :o

How the hell do you function?
My body runs on a strict diet of caffine & nicotine, without coffee (& lots of it) I would struggle to walk on my hind legs!
No nic for me, thanx...
But lots of Twinings, PG Tips, Bewley's...
Kroger house-brand when I'm especially broke...
Carytown Tea Co. and Teavana loose when I have a bit of spare change....

...and diet cola, but it's got less caf.

Diet cola I agree with, just because it tastes better.
But as I have said many times before, tea is DEVIL JIZZ!
& yes I wish I didn't smoke & yes I have tried to give up but I become one grouchy bastard (even more than normal!)
Logged
Im an alltogether different being, I got black wings of fire & eyes of true seeing

85283-071

  • tangentrification on a stick
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 3461
  • M?ust We? Thro?b
Re: "Social" Darwinism vs. Communism vs. Socialism vs. Capitalism
« Reply #11 on: September 25, 2008, 08:34:18 PM »



Good to see you posting up a storm, Jennifer.
Logged
...a little concerned about your sensibilities.

yosmark

  • The Powa. The Powa.
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 5884
Re: "Social" Darwinism vs. Communism vs. Socialism vs. Capitalism
« Reply #12 on: September 25, 2008, 08:42:19 PM »

somebody drank a few too many cups of coffee this morning.
Who?
i see no owls in this vicinity.
Prithee, allow me to clarify:

You have suggested that someone has consumed an excess of coffee this morning.  I wish to know
the identity of the person so described. 

DUH!!! it was CaffeinatedCassadie... I think it´s obvious C.


I am with you on the no coffe thing, Last time I had a cup of coffee I wasn´t able to sleep until 5 am... it´s a bad thing when you really want to sleep.
Logged

colordeaf

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1555
  • New! Chicken of the Galaxy Dolphin Nuggets
    • Gallery of Questionable Taste
Re: "Social" Darwinism vs. Communism vs. Socialism vs. Capitalism
« Reply #13 on: September 25, 2008, 08:50:36 PM »

My friend from elementary school (it was some years ago) recently said that Communism & Socialism have since lost their original meanings... andfrom my history textbook, it seems like way back when, Democrats were Republicans and Republicans were Democrats.

My biology teacer from 9th grade also says Social Darwinism is a corruption of real Darwinism :P
Free ice cream to anyone who can reiterate that.
Logged
Dude...  I'm getting high just from being in the same room with you...

Twice Belladonna

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 302
  • I cut off my hair and went to sleep.
Re: "Social" Darwinism vs. Communism vs. Socialism vs. Capitalism
« Reply #14 on: October 18, 2008, 02:37:25 PM »

i'm a registered communist.
Marx knew what was up.
Logged

CeeGBee

  • Too o-o-old to rock & ro-o-oll, but too young to die...
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18563
    • Facebook, website, what's the dif?
Re: "Social" Darwinism vs. Communism vs. Socialism vs. Capitalism
« Reply #15 on: October 18, 2008, 03:03:23 PM »

i'm a registered communist.
Marx knew what was up.
Marx lacked any remote understanding of human psychology.
Logged
Is it bad that what she said made perfect sense to me?

Brittany

  • agent_smart
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 422
  • So bright, it's like redundant to have the sun out
    • myspace
Re: "Social" Darwinism vs. Communism vs. Socialism vs. Capitalism
« Reply #16 on: October 18, 2008, 03:20:40 PM »

excuse the ignorance, but is there a difference between social darwinism and capitalism?  Communism is a form of Socialism.

I'd take Capitalism with a dash of Socialism.  Give people incentive, but don't let them suffer.
Logged
Cover it in mustard, clap your hands 3 times, close your eyes and say "Go to the fucking doctor"

CeeGBee

  • Too o-o-old to rock & ro-o-oll, but too young to die...
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18563
    • Facebook, website, what's the dif?
Re: "Social" Darwinism vs. Communism vs. Socialism vs. Capitalism
« Reply #17 on: October 18, 2008, 04:00:42 PM »

excuse the ignorance, but is there a difference between social darwinism and capitalism?  Communism is a form of Socialism.

I'd take Capitalism with a dash of Socialism.  Give people incentive, but don't let them suffer.
The Social Darwinist sells all his shares to his partners and moves out of state just before
the rioting workers burn down the plant.  His capitalist partners are surprised that their
modestly-paid security guards don't do anything to stop them.
Logged
Is it bad that what she said made perfect sense to me?

Mr. Anagrammatism

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 950
  • YES WE CAN !!!!
Re: "Social" Darwinism vs. Communism vs. Socialism vs. Capitalism
« Reply #18 on: October 18, 2008, 11:51:18 PM »

I like Paleinism!
Logged

85283-071

  • tangentrification on a stick
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 3461
  • M?ust We? Thro?b
Re: "Social" Darwinism vs. Communism vs. Socialism vs. Capitalism
« Reply #19 on: October 19, 2008, 06:51:00 PM »

i'm a registered communist.
Marx knew what was up.


Communism is an unrealistic fantasy. The resources required to distribute the wealth amongst a population, in a system free of corruption, leaves very little for distribution. It's a service industry that produces nothing. Add the reality of power, and a whole new percentage of resources are chopped off the top. Communism fails, mathematically, in a perfect world. In the real world, it can't even rise above the threshold of catastrophe.
Logged
...a little concerned about your sensibilities.

dontgoogleme

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 41
Re: "Social" Darwinism vs. Communism vs. Socialism vs. Capitalism
« Reply #20 on: October 20, 2008, 09:18:25 AM »

Anarchism, ideally. I have no idea how it would work on a global scale though...

Note to self: Read more.
Logged
Ask for me tomorrow and you shall find me a grave man

Maxnot

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 744
Re: "Social" Darwinism vs. Communism vs. Socialism vs. Capitalism
« Reply #21 on: October 20, 2008, 10:16:31 AM »

Hmmm, probably capitalism but you could possibly input some socialist ideas into it. Communism would never work.
Logged

Twice Belladonna

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 302
  • I cut off my hair and went to sleep.
Re: "Social" Darwinism vs. Communism vs. Socialism vs. Capitalism
« Reply #22 on: October 20, 2008, 05:36:17 PM »

i'm a registered communist.
Marx knew what was up.


Communism is an unrealistic fantasy. The resources required to distribute the wealth amongst a population, in a system free of corruption, leaves very little for distribution. It's a service industry that produces nothing. Add the reality of power, and a whole new percentage of resources are chopped off the top. Communism fails, mathematically, in a perfect world. In the real world, it can't even rise above the threshold of catastrophe.

and i suppose capitalism works splendidly? that's why there are homeless people and a welfare system that traps people into feeding off of the government.
where communism is active, such as china, i won't try to suggest that that is working any better than capitalism, but that's because what's going on there is a corruption of communism.
i always have this discussion with people and to be honest i couldn't give two shits about the economy or economic philosophy, OR how communism comes into play in those aspects. all i care about is the fact that it RECOGNIZES social equality, and don't come at me with all this bullocks about how people aren't really equal. yes some people are retarded and some are blind and some are better at some shit than others. fuck that shit. that doesn't mean anyone's better than anyone else, and that's the only thing that i care about politically. that's all i have to say on the matter. disagree all you like.
Logged

lil' lindsay

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 256
  • im this many.
Re: "Social" Darwinism vs. Communism vs. Socialism vs. Capitalism
« Reply #23 on: October 20, 2008, 06:01:19 PM »

Capitalism needs maintenance like any other system. In reality, it is the default setting of any trading community. We do not exchange goods for goods. The world has moved way beyond that. We have replaced much of our method of war with trade. It is and must be recognized as the machine the runs societies. Capitalism can shift and buffer corruption. Communism cannot function with any corruption. It's unrealistic.

But yes, capitalism works. The wondrous inventions that fill your world are the fallout of capitalism. So is the quality of life and health you enjoy. Even the poor in a strong capitalist society enjoy luxuries that are unknown to most people outside of our world. Equality? Do you really think there is any fruit in that mandate? It's a declaration in a manifesto. In Cuba, racism is illegal. Pretty simple, eh? How do you think it plays out? It's easy to see, feel and sense our problems from the inside. In that sense, there will always be a platform from which people can cry for a new way. The mark of progress is to take what works from a high functioning system and tweak what remains as demands indicate. I've railed against the system for decades, but communism is failed from it's conception. It displaces inspiration and ambition with a mandate of equality of circumstance... no matter what... no matter what you do to contribute to it... no matter how impossible it is to deliver on that promise. That's what it is. Communism is a promise. Capitalism is a system. Even communist societies have to utilize capitalism. It's how we move as a community.

Now, I believe in the value of social programs. I have lived in a functioning socialist nation. Still, the betterment of the people always rides on the coattails of capitalist kinesis.

Fact.
Logged
mommy's wingman

caddy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3463
  • The Anti-Semantic
Re: "Social" Darwinism vs. Communism vs. Socialism vs. Capitalism
« Reply #24 on: October 20, 2008, 09:20:51 PM »

one - capitalism sucks.

two - Communism assumes that humans aren't naturally selfish (as Social Darwinism only proves), and therefore WOULDN'T WORK.

three - most Anarchists wouldn't survive ten minutes in a truly Anachist society, because they're wishy washy, artsy fartsy pushovers.  Anarchy is usually a utopia for teen rebels (I DON'T HAVE TO GO TO SCHOOL!), and mid-life crisis rebels (I CAN FUCK TEENS WHO DON'T WANT TO GO TO SCHOOL!), who dream of a place where they could do whatever they wanted, whenever they wanted, however they wanted--without realizing that this involves being stressed out of your mind while you're trying to avoid the shit end of a semi-automatic.  i think the only person on this board who could manage it would be NickNJ.

four - Socialism is just a wishy washy form of Communism, and wouldn't work, either.  most people can't even balance their own checkbook properly, much less run the society they live in.  blame the rich kids who convinced you to stop watching the man behind the curtain, and start watching television.


Capitalism sucks, but if you inserted any other form of government in it's place, the world would crumble.  we're at a point where we can't just change, or switch over.  hell, the American dollar, paper money, is worthless at this point, and either way China owns our souls already.  i'm not saying we should give up, but the idea of balance is there for a reason.  you have to balance the bad with the good.  you need both.

at this point in our society, i highly doubt, unless some major catastrophe occurred, we could ween ourselves off currency, which is simply the root of all modern evil.




god, you know what?  i sound so cynical.  is that my fault, or should i just blame society?
Logged

lil' lindsay

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 256
  • im this many.
Re: "Social" Darwinism vs. Communism vs. Socialism vs. Capitalism
« Reply #25 on: October 20, 2008, 09:39:26 PM »

you are a very jaded and cynical girl ms. .net.
Logged
mommy's wingman

caddy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3463
  • The Anti-Semantic
Re: "Social" Darwinism vs. Communism vs. Socialism vs. Capitalism
« Reply #26 on: October 21, 2008, 02:41:14 AM »

yes, and you are crunchy, and taste good with ketchup.
Logged

The Angel Raliel

  • ...looked the other way when a third of them fell
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 7620
  • ...devourer of scones
    • Raliel Art
Re: "Social" Darwinism vs. Communism vs. Socialism vs. Capitalism
« Reply #27 on: October 21, 2008, 03:12:56 AM »

we need a global dictator ( the sort with secret islands and crazy technology ), the rest of the world would unite in an effort to overthrow the eeevil Doctor von Death, and might actually sort a load of other stuff out in the process......
either that or a system where  capitalism is in place for 5 years, and then automatically replaced with a 5 year period of socialism...... Britian used to kind of work this way until Labour stopped being a socialist party and became New Labour (essentially slightly more liberal conservatives)
Logged
One should always be a little improbable.

@raliel

lil' lindsay

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 256
  • im this many.
Re: "Social" Darwinism vs. Communism vs. Socialism vs. Capitalism
« Reply #28 on: October 21, 2008, 10:03:15 AM »

yes, and you are crunchy, and taste good with ketchup.

i taste good with or without ketchup.
Logged
mommy's wingman

dontgoogleme

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 41
Re: "Social" Darwinism vs. Communism vs. Socialism vs. Capitalism
« Reply #29 on: October 21, 2008, 11:51:04 AM »

three - most Anarchists wouldn't survive ten minutes in a truly Anachist society, because they're wishy washy, artsy fartsy pushovers.  Anarchy is usually a utopia for teen rebels (I DON'T HAVE TO GO TO SCHOOL!), and mid-life crisis rebels (I CAN FUCK TEENS WHO DON'T WANT TO GO TO SCHOOL!), who dream of a place where they could do whatever they wanted, whenever they wanted, however they wanted--without realizing that this involves being stressed out of your mind while you're trying to avoid the shit end of a semi-automatic.  i think the only person on this board who could manage it would be NickNJ.

This is quite frankly bollocks. A lot of grassroots political protest movements are built on anarchist principles. I know because I am involved with them. I have seen it work, and work well; everyone feels like they are being listened to and no individual can hijack the campaign. It has the added benefit that the police have a lot more trouble identifying the "organisers" they need to strategically target....

Anarchism does not mean "everyone doing what the fuck they want", it means "everyone participating in decision making in a non-hierarchical manner". Rules can and do exist, but they come from the collective interest rather than somebody's top-down influence. For an example refer to the Peoples' Global Action network: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peoples%27_Global_Action - the PGA hallmarks are a general set of "rules", which were agreed on by people from all over the planet who shared a common interest.

Note I said "common interest". I'm not sure how this works if there is no common interest, which is why I said I don't know how anarchism would work on a global scale.

we're at a point where we can't just change, or switch over.

I agree with this; some people are doing very well from capitalism and would resist it strongly.
Logged
Ask for me tomorrow and you shall find me a grave man

CeeGBee

  • Too o-o-old to rock & ro-o-oll, but too young to die...
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18563
    • Facebook, website, what's the dif?
Re: "Social" Darwinism vs. Communism vs. Socialism vs. Capitalism
« Reply #30 on: October 21, 2008, 01:54:23 PM »

three - most Anarchists wouldn't survive ten minutes in a truly Anachist society, because they're wishy washy, artsy fartsy pushovers.  Anarchy is usually a utopia for teen rebels (I DON'T HAVE TO GO TO SCHOOL!), and mid-life crisis rebels (I CAN FUCK TEENS WHO DON'T WANT TO GO TO SCHOOL!), who dream of a place where they could do whatever they wanted, whenever they wanted, however they wanted--without realizing that this involves being stressed out of your mind while you're trying to avoid the shit end of a semi-automatic.  i think the only person on this board who could manage it would be NickNJ.

This is quite frankly bollocks. A lot of grassroots political protest movements are built on anarchist principles. I know because I am involved with them. I have seen it work, and work well; everyone feels like they are being listened to and no individual can hijack the campaign. It has the added benefit that the police have a lot more trouble identifying the "organisers" they need to strategically target....
In simplest terms...  "wrong"...
Anarchy, by definition, is an absence of organized decision-making process.
Your organization (oops, "organization" is antithetical to anarchy...)...
Let's try that again:  The principals you call "anarchic" are actually just decentralized...
the political equivalent of bacteria.  Furthermore, even in your "non-hierarchical" structure,
there are a few leaders and a lot of followers.  The leaders simply try to retain some degree
of anonymity so as to avoid any sense of responsibility for the screw-ups of the whole, as
well as internal or external retribution.


Anarchism does not mean "everyone doing what the fuck they want",
Yes, actually, it does...

...it means "everyone participating in decision making in a non-hierarchical manner". Rules can and do exist,
No, actually, they don't...

...but they come from the collective interest rather than somebody's top-down influence.
For an example refer to the Peoples' Global Action network: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peoples%27_Global_Action - the PGA hallmarks are a general set of "rules", which were agreed on by people from all over the planet who shared a common interest.
This is an obscure form of governance called "democracy"...  It has problems when instituted
on a large scale, often requiring layers of "bureaucracy", and eventually devolving to "plutocracy"
or "oligarchy"...


Note I said "common interest". I'm not sure how this works if there is no common interest, which is why I said I don't know how anarchism would work on a global scale.
It doesn't.  People form groups.  Groups band together into larger groups.  Each level of group
has its own rules and mores. As long as the individuals and smaller groups can live within the
constraints of the larger group, all is well.  Once they can't, fighting breaks out, whether it's
a brawl with the bouncers who say you've had enough to drink, or an assault by columns of
tanks and APCs to secure the rights of the oppressed minorities (and the petroleum) of other
countries.

(Don't worry, if true anarchy broke out, a young physically-fit idealist like yourself would
make a fine foot-soldier for someone's gang.  See?  A gang...  safety in numbers...
The end of that anarchy is already in sight.)
Logged
Is it bad that what she said made perfect sense to me?

dontgoogleme

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 41
Re: "Social" Darwinism vs. Communism vs. Socialism vs. Capitalism
« Reply #31 on: October 21, 2008, 02:31:04 PM »

I guess it's worth first stating that there are many different takes on anarchy...

In simplest terms...  "wrong"...
Anarchy, by definition, is an absence of organized decision-making process.
Your organization (oops, "organization" is antithetical to anarchy...)...
Let's try that again:  The principals you call "anarchic" are actually just decentralized...
the political equivalent of bacteria.  Furthermore, even in your "non-hierarchical" structure,
there are a few leaders and a lot of followers.  The leaders simply try to retain some degree
of anonymity so as to avoid any sense of responsibility for the screw-ups of the whole, as
well as internal or external retribution.

I would refer you to the wikipedia article (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchism):

'It is defined by The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Politics as "the view that society can and should be organized without a coercive state."'

This is interesting because it using the word 'organized', which you claim is somewhat taboo to suggest in the context of anarchy. This isn't the case - anarchy can be organised, but just not via a hierarchical power structure.

I'd like to see a definition of anarchy which includes the words "absence of organized decision-making process" - the anarchist groups I've been involved in have a very clear process (based on consensus decision making), but that still doesn't imply having leaders. I'm also not sure how you can claim "The leaders simply try to retain some degree of anonymity so as to avoid any sense of responsibility for the screw-ups of the whole, as well as internal or external retribution" without knowing which groups I am involved in... (I don't agree with this anyway)

...but they come from the collective interest rather than somebody's top-down influence.
For an example refer to the Peoples' Global Action network: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peoples%27_Global_Action - the PGA hallmarks are a general set of "rules", which were agreed on by people from all over the planet who shared a common interest.
This is an obscure form of governance called "democracy"...  It has problems when instituted
on a large scale, often requiring layers of "bureaucracy", and eventually devolving to "plutocracy"
or "oligarchy"...

Democracy relies on the "people" electing a set of "leaders" who then make decisions on their behalf. It does not provide for the "people" having equal say in decisions as the "leaders". In anarchism the people *are* the leaders. (Yes, in democracy an individual can theoretically rise to power. I would suggest this system is pretty broken in today's society.) (Yes, I know your comments on plutocracy and oligarchy as basically agreeing with me on this.)

Note I said "common interest". I'm not sure how this works if there is no common interest, which is why I said I don't know how anarchism would work on a global scale.
It doesn't.  People form groups.  Groups band together into larger groups.  Each level of group
has its own rules and mores. As long as the individuals and smaller groups can live within the
constraints of the larger group, all is well.  Once they can't, fighting breaks out, whether it's
a brawl with the bouncers who say you've had enough to drink, or an assault by columns of
tanks and APCs to secure the rights of the oppressed minorities (and the petroleum) of other
countries.

No, maybe it doesn't... I don't know. I think it's a question worth asking though, rather than just dismissing on the basis that it hasn't worked so far.

Anyway, this is a fun discussion to have, but ultimately I'm not trying to convince anybody else to agree with me... y'all believe what you want and be happy.
Logged
Ask for me tomorrow and you shall find me a grave man

CeeGBee

  • Too o-o-old to rock & ro-o-oll, but too young to die...
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18563
    • Facebook, website, what's the dif?
Re: "Social" Darwinism vs. Communism vs. Socialism vs. Capitalism
« Reply #32 on: October 21, 2008, 02:59:03 PM »

Well...  I really don't like to argue semantics...
I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not sure you realize that
what you heard is not what I meant...


...but (and I'll absolutely agree to your right to try to create a world-system that
better responds to what people actually want, while still providing what they actually
need...  whatever you call your system...)

...at their theoretical ideals:
In a Democracy - ALL CITIZENS gather to debate and vote upon issues of consequence to
the state, and arrive at a collective decision on a directly expressed one-man-one-vote basis.

When that's too complicated (say, when your Greek polis grows beyond a thousand "citizens"
or so), the evolutionary step is to...

...a Republic - the spirit is the same, in that each citizen's will is considered equal, but instead
of having EVERYONE get together at once, the citizens subdivide into smaller groups and select
representatives who they feel share their values and beliefs, and those representatives gather
to make direct policy decisions.  (Check out the link, Plato online...  O0)
Logged
Is it bad that what she said made perfect sense to me?

caddy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3463
  • The Anti-Semantic
Re: "Social" Darwinism vs. Communism vs. Socialism vs. Capitalism
« Reply #33 on: October 21, 2008, 03:08:37 PM »


This is quite frankly bollocks. A lot of grassroots political protest movements are built on anarchist principles. I know because I am involved with them. I have seen it work, and work well; everyone feels like they are being listened to and no individual can hijack the campaign. It has the added benefit that the police have a lot more trouble identifying the "organisers" they need to strategically target....

Anarchism does not mean "everyone doing what the fuck they want", it means "everyone participating in decision making in a non-hierarchical manner". Rules can and do exist, but they come from the collective interest rather than somebody's top-down influence. For an example refer to the Peoples' Global Action network: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peoples%27_Global_Action - the PGA hallmarks are a general set of "rules", which were agreed on by people from all over the planet who shared a common interest.

Note I said "common interest". I'm not sure how this works if there is no common interest, which is why I said I don't know how anarchism would work on a global scale.

congrats, you basically described Populism, which is just a watered down form of Socialism.  now, back to the conversation of Anarchy...

...wait.  *ha*  you're a teenager, aren't you?  no, i'm not "Ageist", i just think that considering my first post about this...it's funny.
Logged

CeeGBee

  • Too o-o-old to rock & ro-o-oll, but too young to die...
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18563
    • Facebook, website, what's the dif?
Re: "Social" Darwinism vs. Communism vs. Socialism vs. Capitalism
« Reply #34 on: October 21, 2008, 04:11:16 PM »

...wait.  *ha*  you're a teenager, aren't you?  no, i'm not "Ageist", i just think that considering my first post about this...it's funny.
Are you old enough to have heard...?

If you're not a liberal at 20, you have no heart.  If you're not a Conservative at 50,
you have no brain...


...and that was the saying before the internet made Libertarians, Anarchists, and Ralph Nader
seem "acceptable"...  Well, Nader's still kinda out-there...  but the point is, we shouldn't hold
their youthful naiivete against naiive younger people.  We should take advantage of it for our
own fun and profit, maybe, but never ridicule.  They'll get cynical like us.

Logged
Is it bad that what she said made perfect sense to me?

caddy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3463
  • The Anti-Semantic
Re: "Social" Darwinism vs. Communism vs. Socialism vs. Capitalism
« Reply #35 on: October 21, 2008, 04:13:33 PM »

...wait.  *ha*  you're a teenager, aren't you?  no, i'm not "Ageist", i just think that considering my first post about this...it's funny.
Are you old enough to have heard...?

If you're not a liberal at 20, you have no heart.  If you're not a Conservative at 50,
you have no brain...


...and that was the saying before the internet made Libertarians, Anarchists, and Ralph Nader
seem "acceptable"...  Well, Nader's still kinda out-there...  but the point is, we shouldn't hold
their youthful naiivete against naiive younger people.  We should take advantage of it for our
own fun and profit, maybe, but never ridicule.  They'll get cynical like us.



god forbid they ever become cynical like me.  and i'm stealing that quote.
Logged

dontgoogleme

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 41
Re: "Social" Darwinism vs. Communism vs. Socialism vs. Capitalism
« Reply #36 on: October 21, 2008, 04:18:23 PM »

...wait.  *ha*  you're a teenager, aren't you?  no, i'm not "Ageist", i just think that considering my first post about this...it's funny.

Well I guess yes, I am a teenager for all of 5 months longer, because that makes all the difference! I didn't really consider myself encompassed by your comment about teens though given that I have been in education of my own free will for the last 3 years...

Anyway, I've defined what I consider a good political system, call it what you will, I agree about not arguing semantics.

Also, I really do think I need to read more about these things, as I said in my very first post...
Logged
Ask for me tomorrow and you shall find me a grave man

dontgoogleme

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 41
Re: "Social" Darwinism vs. Communism vs. Socialism vs. Capitalism
« Reply #37 on: October 21, 2008, 04:24:34 PM »

One more thing... The response about the difference between a democracy and a republic is a good one. The difference between democracy and consensus decision making is that CDM strives for as near as possible complete agreement on a decision within the group, whereas democracy only requires majority. Whether CDM implies anarchy, populism or whatever is semantics.
Logged
Ask for me tomorrow and you shall find me a grave man

caddy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3463
  • The Anti-Semantic
Re: "Social" Darwinism vs. Communism vs. Socialism vs. Capitalism
« Reply #38 on: October 21, 2008, 04:25:53 PM »

like i said, i only think that it's funny how you're arguing Anarchy (while using a rather non-anarchist system), and you're a teen.  i never said you were stupid.  ignorant, maybe, but i don't know you well enough to measure your intellect.  it would be nice if all teenagers could get politically involved as teenagers (without having to resort to desiring Anarchy).

then again, i only know what i know about this crap because at the age of 19 i was all like, "MARXISM!  FUCK YEAH!  COMMUNISM!  SOCIALISM!  RISE, PROLETARIAT, RISE!  WOOOOHOOOO!"

*gags*
Logged

caddy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3463
  • The Anti-Semantic
Re: "Social" Darwinism vs. Communism vs. Socialism vs. Capitalism
« Reply #39 on: October 21, 2008, 04:29:23 PM »

One more thing... The response about the difference between a democracy and a republic is a good one. The difference between democracy and consensus decision making is that CDM strives for as near as possible complete agreement on a decision within the group, whereas democracy only requires majority. Whether CDM implies anarchy, populism or whatever is semantics.

CDM would only ever be different from Democracy, if it started with the word Compromise.
Logged

Oskarr Najh

  • Entertainer from the Kabaret Cholera (?)
  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 74
  • with my heart's bloody tatters I'll mock again
    • Kabaret Cholera
Re: "Social" Darwinism vs. Communism vs. Socialism vs. Capitalism
« Reply #40 on: October 21, 2008, 04:56:12 PM »

...wait.  *ha*  you're a teenager, aren't you?  no, i'm not "Ageist", i just think that considering my first post about this...it's funny.

Well I guess yes, I am a teenager for all of 5 months longer, because that makes all the difference! I didn't really consider myself encompassed by your comment about teens though given that I have been in education of my own free will for the last 3 years...

Anyway, I've defined what I consider a good political system, call it what you will, I agree about not arguing semantics.

Also, I really do think I need to read more about these things, as I said in my very first post...

You should read "The Anarchist Morality" from Kropotkin...
And read Georges Darien or Zo D'Axa too. And Guy Debors as well.
And you should visit this :
http://www.theyliewedie.org/ressources/biblio/index-en.php

Anarchists ideas are made to be shared, not to make business. Pidgins buy the books : the fox read'em. 8)

Your definition of anarchy is quiet just. The sense of the word, it's ethymological roots is the "-a" (privative) and "-archie", which mean "-chief".
So an anarchist is someone who decide to have no chief. To be autonomous and regain it's responsability : 'cause the real freedom is not to choose your master, but to have none. Being responsible, it's facing the consequences of it's acts.
The anarchist "large" method would be to raise logical interactive micro-society, ruled by direct democracy.
It can works only with people that realize the importance of being independant, autonomous and responsible.
For brainless zombies, there are republics and dictatorship...
Logged

dontgoogleme

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 41
Re: "Social" Darwinism vs. Communism vs. Socialism vs. Capitalism
« Reply #41 on: October 21, 2008, 05:12:25 PM »

And you should visit this :
http://www.theyliewedie.org/ressources/biblio/index-en.php

Oooh, now that is pretty fucking awesome, I hadn't come across it before.

We have a little anarchisty "library" in the action resource centre in my city, from which I have been slowly making my way through "SchNEWS at Ten" (http://www.amazon.com/Schnews-at-Ten/dp/0952974886/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1224623313&sr=1-4) recently, but I am both a slow reader and always busy, which is a shame. (Okay, well maybe I don't make the time often enough but still.) There are loads of interesting looking books there.
Logged
Ask for me tomorrow and you shall find me a grave man

caddy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3463
  • The Anti-Semantic
Re: "Social" Darwinism vs. Communism vs. Socialism vs. Capitalism
« Reply #42 on: October 21, 2008, 05:29:50 PM »

an·ar·chy        /ˈænərki/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[an-er-kee] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun
1.   a state of society without government or law.
2.   political and social disorder due to the absence of governmental control: The death of the king was followed by a year of anarchy.
3.   a theory that regards the absence of all direct or coercive government as a political ideal and that proposes the cooperative and voluntary association of individuals and groups as the principal mode of organized society.
4.   confusion; chaos; disorder: Intellectual and moral anarchy followed his loss of faith.



you are proposing that people govern themselves, because if they are responsible, then that would be the right thing to do.  it is voluntary, y'know?  the problem with that is, the minute you get people governing themselves, you have something that, essentially, is no longer Anarchy.  it becomes something along the lines of Socialism, Communism (if they are still economically based) or Populism, because everybody (who is responsible, and not brainless, mind you!) has to agree.  they all, also, have to be working (to circulate money, and keep your economy going, or else you go back to a trade and barter system, and nobody wants to harvest shit these days).  if you have a direct democracy (where people gather together to make decisions, instead of voting for others to do so), then you get people trying to all agree on the same thing.  when a group of people start agreeing on how to run things, then immediately comes a group of people who don't agree, and eventually they become dissenters.  now you have two parties all over again.

soon, the dissenters are causing havoc, and now you need somebody to protect those who are responsible.  you get policies having to be enforced all over again.

the circle of life.
Logged

Brittany

  • agent_smart
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 422
  • So bright, it's like redundant to have the sun out
    • myspace
Re: "Social" Darwinism vs. Communism vs. Socialism vs. Capitalism
« Reply #43 on: October 21, 2008, 05:32:29 PM »

One more thing... The response about the difference between a democracy and a republic is a good one. The difference between democracy and consensus decision making is that CDM strives for as near as possible complete agreement on a decision within the group, whereas democracy only requires majority. Whether CDM implies anarchy, populism or whatever is semantics.

I am confused by this "Consensus Decision Making" of yours.  Are you suggesting that this can be part of reality? 
Logged
Cover it in mustard, clap your hands 3 times, close your eyes and say "Go to the fucking doctor"

CeeGBee

  • Too o-o-old to rock & ro-o-oll, but too young to die...
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18563
    • Facebook, website, what's the dif?
Re: "Social" Darwinism vs. Communism vs. Socialism vs. Capitalism
« Reply #44 on: October 21, 2008, 05:39:53 PM »

It's funny how you never hear farmers (the only people who could ever begin to live a life
that's "independent, autonomous, and responsible") spouting this kinda crap.  No, it
seems like it's always "students"...  with no useful skills beyond socio-academic masturbation.
Sure, sometimes they're students who've elected to get a job, but always studying ways
to defy human nature and the simple fact that there are far too many people for "simple"
forms of government to work, independent of a larger structure.  It's good to have a dream,
but if you dream of making people's lives better, you have to remember that you are dealing
with people...  flaws and all.

Compromise = possible

Universal Consensus =  I'll tell ya what.  Get ten people, any ten people, and find ten things
that they all agree upon.  Heck, they don't even need to be "important" things.  Then
we can talk about consensus building for millions.
Logged
Is it bad that what she said made perfect sense to me?

Brittany

  • agent_smart
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 422
  • So bright, it's like redundant to have the sun out
    • myspace
Re: "Social" Darwinism vs. Communism vs. Socialism vs. Capitalism
« Reply #45 on: October 21, 2008, 05:45:08 PM »

That's 'cause farmers got other shit to worry about.  And they've been indoctrinated.

but yeah, otherwise, you have a good point.
Logged
Cover it in mustard, clap your hands 3 times, close your eyes and say "Go to the fucking doctor"

dontgoogleme

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 41
Re: "Social" Darwinism vs. Communism vs. Socialism vs. Capitalism
« Reply #46 on: October 21, 2008, 05:58:28 PM »

I am confused by this "Consensus Decision Making" of yours.  Are you suggesting that this can be part of reality?

I am involved with a group called Climate Camp (http://www.climatecamp.org.uk/), which uses consensus decision making. It works in this context, so to that extent it can be part of reality. My observation is that it works well fundamentally because everybody involved shares the same broad objectives.

I have no idea whether it could work on a larger scale, though climate camp is pretty big (~2000 people at the camp in August, and there tends to be about 150 at each national decision making gathering). Obviously, this is nowhere near the size of a country or even town/city. I have very little knowledge of the process of bigger movements like PGA, but clearly they managed to decide stuff one way or another...
Logged
Ask for me tomorrow and you shall find me a grave man

caddy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3463
  • The Anti-Semantic
Re: "Social" Darwinism vs. Communism vs. Socialism vs. Capitalism
« Reply #47 on: October 21, 2008, 06:01:04 PM »


Compromise = possible



One more thing... The response about the difference between a democracy and a republic is a good one. The difference between democracy and consensus decision making is that CDM strives for as near as possible complete agreement on a decision within the group, whereas democracy only requires majority. Whether CDM implies anarchy, populism or whatever is semantics.

CDM would only ever be different from Democracy, if it started with the word Compromise.


besides, whatever happened to letting the kids have their fun, Cee?
Logged

lil' lindsay

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 256
  • im this many.
Re: "Social" Darwinism vs. Communism vs. Socialism vs. Capitalism
« Reply #48 on: October 21, 2008, 06:04:25 PM »

I have no idea whether it could work on a larger scale, though climate camp is pretty big (~2000 people at the camp in August, and there tends to be about 150 at each national decision making gathering). Obviously, this is nowhere near the size of a country or even town/city. I have very little knowledge of the process of bigger movements like PGA, but clearly they managed to decide stuff one way or another...


add to your considerations that there is bound to be a degree homogeneity in an organization or camp which draws voluntary participation.
Logged
mommy's wingman

CeeGBee

  • Too o-o-old to rock & ro-o-oll, but too young to die...
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18563
    • Facebook, website, what's the dif?
Re: "Social" Darwinism vs. Communism vs. Socialism vs. Capitalism
« Reply #49 on: October 21, 2008, 06:30:58 PM »


Compromise = possible


One more thing... The response about the difference between a democracy and a republic is a good one. The difference between democracy and consensus decision making is that CDM strives for as near as possible complete agreement on a decision within the group, whereas democracy only requires majority. Whether CDM implies anarchy, populism or whatever is semantics.

CDM would only ever be different from Democracy, if it started with the word Compromise.
besides, whatever happened to letting the kids have their fun, Cee?
Somewhere in there, the line between IDEALISM and STUPID got crossed...


I seem to recall saying back at the beginning of this thread that no political philosophy
can be applied to the real world in pure form.  I stand by that.
Logged
Is it bad that what she said made perfect sense to me?

caddy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3463
  • The Anti-Semantic
Re: "Social" Darwinism vs. Communism vs. Socialism vs. Capitalism
« Reply #50 on: October 21, 2008, 09:18:52 PM »


Compromise = possible


One more thing... The response about the difference between a democracy and a republic is a good one. The difference between democracy and consensus decision making is that CDM strives for as near as possible complete agreement on a decision within the group, whereas democracy only requires majority. Whether CDM implies anarchy, populism or whatever is semantics.

CDM would only ever be different from Democracy, if it started with the word Compromise.
besides, whatever happened to letting the kids have their fun, Cee?
Somewhere in there, the line between IDEALISM and STUPID got crossed...


I seem to recall saying back at the beginning of this thread that no political philosophy
can be applied to the real world in pure form.  I stand by that.

agreed.

and agreed.
Logged

colordeaf

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1555
  • New! Chicken of the Galaxy Dolphin Nuggets
    • Gallery of Questionable Taste
Re: "Social" Darwinism vs. Communism vs. Socialism vs. Capitalism
« Reply #51 on: October 26, 2008, 01:43:17 PM »

I have a growing interest in being a (maybe not for all my adult life) vegetable farmer from this thread. Earlier this month, I visited a local farm where there was a yurt out back and frogs. Of course, it was an organic farm and he explained sustainability.
Logged
Dude...  I'm getting high just from being in the same room with you...

Mr. Anagrammatism

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 950
  • YES WE CAN !!!!
Re: "Social" Darwinism vs. Communism vs. Socialism vs. Capitalism
« Reply #52 on: November 04, 2008, 01:55:22 AM »

That's 'cause farmers got other shit to worry about. 

Brittany, that's called fertilizer.   ^-^
Logged

caddy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3463
  • The Anti-Semantic
Re: "Social" Darwinism vs. Communism vs. Socialism vs. Capitalism
« Reply #53 on: November 04, 2008, 03:06:10 AM »

That's 'cause farmers got other shit to worry about.

Brittany, that's called fertilizer.   ^-^

win.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [All]   Go Up